大家好,又见面了,我是全栈君
关于db_block_gets了解和实验
实验
一、 自己手动创建的小表
创建一个区大小为 40k SYS@ORCL>show parameter db_block_size
NAME TYPE VALUE ———————————— ———– —————————— db_block_size integer 8192
SYS@ORCL>create tablespace tyger1 datafile ‘/u01/app/oracle/oradata/ORCL/tyger1.dbf’ size 10m 2 extent management local uniform size 40k;
Tablespace created.
SYS@ORCL>create table test_db1(x int) tablespace tyger1;
Table created.
SYS@ORCL>set autotrace on SYS@ORCL>insert into test_db1 values(1);
1 row created.
Execution Plan ———————————————————-
————————————————————————- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ————————————————————————- | 0 | INSERT STATEMENT | | 1 | 100 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | ————————————————————————-
Statistics ———————————————————- 1 recursive calls 19 db block gets 1 consistent gets 3 physical reads 964 redo size 675 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 562 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 1 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1 rows processed
SYS@ORCL>insert into test_db1 values(2);
1 row created.
Execution Plan ———————————————————-
————————————————————————- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ————————————————————————- | 0 | INSERT STATEMENT | | 1 | 100 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | ————————————————————————-
Statistics ———————————————————- 1 recursive calls 3 db block gets 1 consistent gets 0 physical reads 244 redo size 675 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 562 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 1 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1 rows processed
2. 创建一个区 大小为80k SYS@ORCL>create tablespace tyger2 datafile ‘/u01/app/oracle/oradata/ORCL/tyger2.dbf’ size 10m 2 extent management local uniform size 80k;
Tablespace created.
SYS@ORCL>create table test_db2(x int) tablespace tyger2;
Table created.
SYS@ORCL>insert into test_db2 values(1);
1 row created.
Execution Plan ———————————————————-
————————————————————————- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ————————————————————————- | 0 | INSERT STATEMENT | | 1 | 100 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | ————————————————————————-
Statistics ———————————————————- 1 recursive calls 29 db block gets 1 consistent gets 28 physical reads 1364 redo size 675 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 562 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 1 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1 rows processed
SYS@ORCL>insert into test_db2 values(2);
1 row created.
Execution Plan ———————————————————-
————————————————————————- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ————————————————————————- | 0 | INSERT STATEMENT | | 1 | 100 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | ————————————————————————-
Statistics ———————————————————- 1 recursive calls 3 db block gets 1 consistent gets 0 physical reads 288 redo size 677 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 562 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 1 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1 rows processed
结论:对于新创建的表来说。由于创建的是空表就没有对表里的空间进行分配,当插入第一条数据时,就须要对区上的块进行空间分配和对数据字典的一些操作,就会有比較大的db_block_size。
假设再次插入数据的话就基本没有对空间的分配啥的,就会有比較少的db_block_size产生。
所以对于extent指定的区大小来说 相同的空表插入相同的数据 db_block_size 可能不同。
对插入更新、删除的实验: SYS@ORCL>update test_db1 set x=3 where x=1;
1 row updated.
Execution Plan ———————————————————- Plan hash value: 2185639234
——————————————————————————- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ——————————————————————————- | 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | 1 | 13 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 1 | UPDATE | TEST_DB1 | | | | | |* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_DB1 | 1 | 13 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | ——————————————————————————-
Predicate Information (identified by operation id): —————————————————
2 – filter(“X”=1)
Note —– – dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics ———————————————————- 28 recursive calls 1 db block gets 11 consistent gets 0 physical reads 388 redo size 678 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 565 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 1 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1 rows processed
SYS@ORCL>delete test_db1 where x=2;
1 row deleted.
Execution Plan ———————————————————- Plan hash value: 3135214910
——————————————————————————- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ——————————————————————————- | 0 | DELETE STATEMENT | | 1 | 13 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 1 | DELETE | TEST_DB1 | | | | | |* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_DB1 | 1 | 13 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | ——————————————————————————-
Predicate Information (identified by operation id): —————————————————
2 – filter(“X”=2)
Note —– – dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics ———————————————————- 5 recursive calls 1 db block gets 9 consistent gets 0 physical reads 288 redo size 678 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 557 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 1 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1 rows processed
SYS@ORCL>insert into test_db1 values(&x); Enter value for x: 1 old 1: insert into test_db1 values(&x) new 1: insert into test_db1 values(1)
1 row created.
。。。。 SYS@ORCL>commit;
Commit complete.
SYS@ORCL>select * from test_db1;
X ———- 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 19 10 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
21 rows selected.
SYS@ORCL>alter system flush buffer_cache;
System altered. SYS@ORCL>update test_db1 set x=21 where x=18;
1 row updated.
Execution Plan ———————————————————- Plan hash value: 2185639234
——————————————————————————- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ——————————————————————————- | 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | 1 | 13 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 1 | UPDATE | TEST_DB1 | | | | | |* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_DB1 | 1 | 13 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | ——————————————————————————-
Predicate Information (identified by operation id): —————————————————
2 – filter(“X”=18)
Note —– – dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics ———————————————————- 5 recursive calls 1 db block gets 9 consistent gets 0 physical reads 412 redo size 678 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 567 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 1 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1 rows processed
二、对于比較大的表来说
SYS@ORCL>create table test_db1 as select * from dba_objects;
Table created. SYS@ORCL>insert into test_db1 values(‘tyger’,’tyger’,’tyger’,22,23,’tyger’,’04-SEP-14′,’04-SEP-14′,’tyger’,’t’,’t’,’t’,’t’);
1 row created.
Execution Plan ———————————————————-
————————————————————————- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ————————————————————————- | 0 | INSERT STATEMENT | | 1 | 100 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | ————————————————————————-
Statistics ———————————————————- 1 recursive calls 15 db block gets 1 consistent gets 5 physical reads 1144 redo size 677 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 646 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 1 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1 rows processed
SYS@ORCL>alter system flush buffer_cache;
System altered.
SYS@ORCL>update test_db1 set OBJECT_NAME=’tom’ where owner=’tyger’;
3 rows updated.
Execution Plan ———————————————————- Plan hash value: 2185639234
——————————————————————————- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ——————————————————————————- | 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | 8 | 664 | 154 (2)| 00:00:02 | | 1 | UPDATE | TEST_DB1 | | | | | |* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_DB1 | 8 | 664 | 154 (2)| 00:00:02 | ——————————————————————————-
Predicate Information (identified by operation id): —————————————————
2 – filter(“OWNER”=’tyger’)
Note —– – dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics ———————————————————- 5 recursive calls 3 db block gets 769 consistent gets 687 physical reads 824 redo size 679 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 589 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 1 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 3 rows processed SYS@ORCL>delete test_db1 where owner=’tyger’;
3 rows deleted.
Execution Plan ———————————————————- Plan hash value: 3135214910
——————————————————————————- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ——————————————————————————- | 0 | DELETE STATEMENT | | 8 | 136 | 154 (2)| 00:00:02 | | 1 | DELETE | TEST_DB1 | | | | | |* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_DB1 | 8 | 136 | 154 (2)| 00:00:02 | ——————————————————————————-
Predicate Information (identified by operation id): —————————————————
2 – filter(“OWNER”=’tyger’)
Note —– – dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics ———————————————————- 4 recursive calls 3 db block gets 769 consistent gets 0 physical reads 1064 redo size 679 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 567 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 1 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 3 rows processed
结论:对于占用多个段的大表来说。可能对数据改动时 对 数据字典 或者对于区、块的分配都包括在 physical reads中。
感想:
对于生产库来说,这个值一般不会太考虑究竟数字是怎么来的,由于数字都比较大,通常只关心它的尺寸大小。
版权声明:本文博主原创文章。博客,未经同意不得转载。
发布者:全栈程序员栈长,转载请注明出处:https://javaforall.cn/116932.html原文链接:https://javaforall.cn
扫码关注腾讯云开发者
领取腾讯云代金券
Copyright © 2013 - 2025 Tencent Cloud. All Rights Reserved. 腾讯云 版权所有
深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司 ICP备案/许可证号:粤B2-20090059 深公网安备号 44030502008569
腾讯云计算(北京)有限责任公司 京ICP证150476号 | 京ICP备11018762号 | 京公网安备号11010802020287
Copyright © 2013 - 2025 Tencent Cloud.
All Rights Reserved. 腾讯云 版权所有