原文:http://javascript-puzzlers.herokuapp.com/
Javascript环境: 浏览器标准 ECMA 262 (5.1)
运行结果可能跟node 或者jsc REPL中有所不同。 比如 this 和 global 在 firefox console, node repl 和jsc shell 是不一样的。
绿色部分是正确答案。
["1", "2", "3"].map(parseInt)
["1", "2", "3"][1, 2, 3][0, 1, 2]other what you actually get is [1, NaN, NaN] because parseInt takes two parameters (val, radix) and map passes 3(element, index, array)
[typeof null, null instanceof Object]
["object", false][null, false]["object", true]other typeof will always return "object" for native non callable objects.
[ [3,2,1].reduce(Math.pow), [].reduce(Math.pow) ]
an error[9, 0][9, NaN][9, undefined] Per spec: reduce on an empty array without an initial value throws TypeError
var val = 'smtg';console.log('Value is ' + (val === 'smtg') ? 'Something' : 'Nothing');
Value is SomethingValue is NothingNaNother it actually prints 'Something' the + operator has higher precedence than the ternary one.
var name = 'World!';(function () { if (typeof name === 'undefined') { var name = 'Jack'; console.log('Goodbye ' + name); } else { console.log('Hello ' + name); }})();
Goodbye JackHello JackHello undefinedHello World The var declaration is hoisted to the function scope, but the initialization is not.
var END = Math.pow(2, 53);var START = END - 100;var count = 0;for (var i = START; i <= END; i++) { count++;}console.log(count);
0100101other it goes into an infinite loop, 2^53 is the highest possible number in javascript, and 2^53+1 gives 2^53, so i can never become larger than that.
var ary = [0,1,2];ary[10] = 10;ary.filter(function(x) { return x === undefined;});
[undefined × 7][0, 1, 2, 10][][undefined] Array.prototype.filter is not invoked for the missing elements.
var two = 0.2 var one = 0.1 var eight = 0.8 var six = 0.6[two - one == one, eight - six == two]
[true, true][false, false][true, false]other JavaScript does not have precision math, even though sometimes it works correctly.
function showCase(value) { switch(value) { case 'A': console.log('Case A'); break; case 'B': console.log('Case B'); break; case undefined: console.log('undefined'); break; default: console.log('Do not know!'); }}showCase(new String('A'));
Case ACase BDo not know!undefined switch uses === internally and new String(x) !== x
function showCase2(value) { switch(value) { case 'A': console.log('Case A'); break; case 'B': console.log('Case B'); break; case undefined: console.log('undefined'); break; default: console.log('Do not know!'); }}showCase2(String('A'));
Case ACase BDo not know!undefined String(x) does not create an object but does return a string, i.e. typeof String(1) === "string"
function isOdd(num) { return num % 2 == 1;}function isEven(num) { return num % 2 == 0;}function isSane(num) { return isEven(num) || isOdd(num);}var values = [7, 4, '13', -9, Infinity];values.map(isSane);
[true, true, true, true, true][true, true, true, true, false][true, true, true, false, false][true, true, false, false, false] Infinity % 2 gives NaN, -9 % 2 gives -1 (modulo operator keeps sign so it's result is only reliable compared to 0)
parseInt(3, 8)parseInt(3, 2)parseInt(3, 0)
3, 3, 33, 3, NaN3, NaN, NaNother 3 doesn't exist in base 2, so obviously that's a NaN, but what about 0? parseInt will consider a bogus radix and assume you meant 10, so it returns 3.
Array.isArray( Array.prototype )
truefalseerrorother Array.prototype is an Array. Go figure.
var a = [0];if ([0]) { console.log(a == true);} else { console.log("wut");}
truefalse"wut"other [0] as a boolean is considered true. Alas, when using it in the comparisons it gets converted in a different way and all goes to hell.
[]==[]
truefalseerrorother == is the spawn of satan.
'5' + 3 '5' - 3
"53", 28, 2errorother Strings know about + and will use it, but they are ignorant of - so in that case the strings get converted to numbers.
1 + - + + + - + 1
21errorother Great fun.
var ary = Array(3);ary[0]=2ary.map(function(elem) { return '1'; });
[2, 1, 1]["1", "1", "1"][2, "1", "1"]other The result is ["1", undefined × 2], as map is only invoked for elements of the Array which have been initialized.
function sidEffecting(ary) { ary[0] = ary[2];}function bar(a,b,c) { c = 10 sidEffecting(arguments); return a + b + c;}bar(1,1,1)
312errorother The result is 21, in javascript variables are tied to the arguments object so changing the variables changesarguments and changing arguments changes the local variables even when they are not in the same scope.
var a = 111111111111111110000, b = 1111;a + b;
111111111111111111111111111111111111110000NaNInfinity Lack of precision for numbers in JavaScript affects both small and big numbers.
var x = [].reverse;x();
[]undefinederrorwindow [].reverse will return this and when invoked without an explicit receiver object it will default to the defaultthis AKA window
Number.MIN_VALUE > 0
falsetrueerrorother Number.MIN_VALUE is the smallest value bigger than zero, -Number.MAX_VALUE gets you a reference to something like the most negative number.
[1 < 2 < 3, 3 < 2 < 1]
[true, true][true, false]errorother Implicit conversions at work. both true and false are greater than any number.
2 == [[[2]]]
truefalseundefinedother both objects get converted to strings and in both cases the resulting string is "2"
3.toString() 3..toString() 3...toString()
"3", error, error"3", "3.0", errorerror, "3", errorother 3.x is a valid syntax to define "3" with a mantissa of x, toString is not a valid number, but the empty string is.
(function(){ var x = y = 1;})();console.log(y);console.log(x);
1, 1error, error1, errorother y is an automatic global, not a function local one.
var a = /123/, b = /123/;a == ba === b
true, truetrue, falsefalse, falseother Per spec Two regular expression literals in a program evaluate to regular expression objects that never compare as === to each other even if the two literals' contents are identical.
var a = [1, 2, 3], b = [1, 2, 3], c = [1, 2, 4]a == ba === ba > ca < c
false, false, false, truefalse, false, false, falsetrue, true, false, trueother Arrays are compared lexicographically with > and <, but not with == and ===
var a = {}, b = Object.prototype;[a.prototype === b, Object.getPrototypeOf(a) === b]
[false, true][true, true][false, false]other Functions have a prototype property but other objects don't so a.prototype is undefined.
Every Object instead has an internal property accessible via Object.getPrototypeOf
function f() {}var a = f.prototype, b = Object.getPrototypeOf(f);a === b
truefalsenullother f.prototype is the object that will become the parent of any objects created with new f whileObject.getPrototypeOf returns the parent in the inheritance hierarchy.
function foo() { }var oldName = foo.name;foo.name = "bar";[oldName, foo.name]
error["", ""]["foo", "foo"]["foo", "bar"] name is a read only property. Why it doesn't throw an error when assigned, I do not know.
"1 2 3".replace(/\d/g, parseInt)
"1 2 3""0 1 2""NaN 2 3""1 NaN 3" String.prototype.replace invokes the callback function with multiple arguments where the first is the match, then there is one argument for each capturing group, then there is the offset of the matched substring and finally the original string itself. so parseInt will be invoked with arguments 1, 0, 2, 2, 3, 4.
function f() {}var parent = Object.getPrototypeOf(f);f.name // ?parent.name // ?typeof eval(f.name) // ?typeof eval(parent.name) // ?
"f", "Empty", "function", "function""f", undefined, "function", error"f", "Empty", "function", errorother The function prototype object is defined somewhere, has a name, can be invoked, but it's not in the current scope.
var lowerCaseOnly = /^[a-z]+$/;[lowerCaseOnly.test(null), lowerCaseOnly.test()]
[true, false]error[true, true][false, true] the argument is converted to a string with the abstract ToString operation, so it is "null" and "undefined".
[,,,].join(", ")
", , , ""undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined"", , """ JavaScript allows a trailing comma when defining arrays, so that turns out to be an array of three undefined.
var a = {class: "Animal", name: 'Fido'};a.class
"Animal"Objectan errorother The answer is: it depends on the browser. class is a reserved word, but it is accepted as a property name by Chrome, Firefox and Opera. It will fail in IE. On the other hand, everybody will accept most other reserved words (int, private, throws etc) as variable names too, while class is verboten.