— 01 —
背景
Background
目前主流AI生产力工具中的如下3类,从输入形式、核心能力、输出形式、客户端等多方面来比较,概要如下:
The following three types of mainstream AI productivity tools are compared from various aspects such as input format, core capabilities, output format, and client platforms. The summary is as follows:
— 02 —
核心差异点
Key Differences
ChatGPT积累久,其英文、充足语料带来的编码、医学等自然科学能力强大,衍生的翻译也比较权威;Kimi基于互联网搜索可提高答案真实性,降低了毫无参考胡乱杜撰的概率,而豆包则提供了丰富的输入输出形式以及多样化的客户端。
ChatGPT has a long accumulation of data, and its proficiency in English and abundant training data contribute to its strong capabilities in fields like coding, medicine, and other natural sciences. Its derived translations are also quite authoritative. Kimi, based on internet search, enhances the authenticity of its answers, reducing the chances of fabricating responses with no references. On the other hand, Doubao offers a rich variety of input/output formats and diverse client platforms.
— End —
创造价值 追求卓越 与时间同行
Value Excellence Time
领取专属 10元无门槛券
私享最新 技术干货