blocks|key|5648464|text|我发现的另一个选项是对存根+Content-Type:+application/x-www-form-urlencoded使用contains|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|CODE|entityRanges|data|5648465|{
++"request":+{
++++"method":+"POST",
++++"url":+"/oauth/token",
++++"basicAuthCredentials":+{
++++++...
++++},
++++"bodyPatterns":+[
++++++{
++++++++"contains":+"username=someuser"
++++++}
++++]
++},
++"response":+{
++++....
++}
}|code-block|syntax|javascript|5648466|entityMap^0|B|2|E|1B|1R|8|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@$9|O|A|P|B|C]|$9|Q|A|R|B|D]|$9|S|A|T|B|D]]|E|@]|F|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|I|7|U|8|@]|E|@]|F|$J|K]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|E|@]|F|$]]]|M|$]]

Another option that I found was to use <code>contains</code> for Stubbing <code>Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded</code>

<pre><code>{
 "request": {
 "method": "POST",
 "url": "/oauth/token",
 "basicAuthCredentials": {
 ...
 },
 "bodyPatterns": [
 {
 "contains": "username=someuser"
 }
 ]
 },
 "response": {
 ....
 }
}
</code></pre>

blocks|key|3536859|text|在经典wiremock中，你可以使用bodyPatterns的匹配器和正则表达式：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3536860|例如：|3536861|...
"request":+{
+++"method":+"POST",
+++"url":+"/api/v1/auth/login",
+++"bodyPatterns":+[
+++++{
+++++++"matches":+"(.*&%7C%5E)username=test($%7C&.*)"
+++++},
+++++{
+++++++"matches":+"(.*&%7C%5E)password=123($%7C&.*)"
+++++}
+++]
},|code-block|syntax|javascript|3536862|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|F|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$G|H]]|$1|I|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|J|$]]

With classic wiremock you can use bodyPatterns' matchers and regular expressions:

for example:

<pre><code>...
"request": {
 "method": "POST",
 "url": "/api/v1/auth/login",
 "bodyPatterns": [
 {
 "matches": "(.*&amp;|^)username=test($|&amp;.*)"
 },
 {
 "matches": "(.*&amp;|^)password=123($|&amp;.*)"
 }
 ]
},
</code></pre>

blocks|key|2382738|text|你可以试试https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2382739|匹配查询参数和body可以使用以下示例json：|style|BOLD|2382740|{
++++"Guid":+"dae02a0d-8a33-46ed-aab0-afbecc8643e3",
++++"Request":+{
++++++"Url":+"/testabc",
++++++"Methods":+[
++++++++"put"
++++++],
++++++"Params":+[
++++++++{
++++++++++"Name":+"start",
++++++++++"Values":+[+"1000",+"1001"+]
++++++++},
++++++++{
++++++++++"Name":+"end",
++++++++++"Values":+[+"42"+]
++++++++}
++++++],
+++++++"Body":+{
++++++++"Matcher":+{
++++++++++"Name":+"WildcardMatcher",
++++++++++"Pattern":+"test*test"
++++++++}
++++++}
++++}
}|code-block|syntax|javascript|2382741|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net^0|5|18|0|0|4|2|7|4|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@$A|V|B|W|1|X]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Y|8|@$A|Z|B|10|F|G]|$A|11|B|12|F|G]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|J|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|C|$K|L]]|$1|M|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|N|$O|$5|P|Q|R|C|$S|T]]]]

You could try <a href="https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net</a>

Matching query parameters and body can be done with this example json:

<pre><code>{
 "Guid": "dae02a0d-8a33-46ed-aab0-afbecc8643e3",
 "Request": {
 "Url": "/testabc",
 "Methods": [
 "put"
 ],
 "Params": [
 {
 "Name": "start",
 "Values": [ "1000", "1001" ]
 },
 {
 "Name": "end",
 "Values": [ "42" ]
 }
 ],
 "Body": {
 "Matcher": {
 "Name": "WildcardMatcher",
 "Pattern": "test*test"
 }
 }
 }
}
</code></pre>

blocks|key|3536910|text|我遇到了一个类似的问题--我想检查确切的参数，但没有使用patterm的魔力(所以更容易维护)。作为一种解决办法，我创建了一个帮助器类：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3536911|import+java.util.Iterator;
import+java.util.LinkedHashMap;

public+class+WireMockUtil+{
++++public+static+String+toFormUrlEncoded(LinkedHashMap<String,+String>+map)+{
++++++++if+(map+==+null)+{
++++++++++++return+"";
++++++++}
++++++++StringBuilder+sb+=+new+StringBuilder();
++++++++Iterator<String>+it+=+map.keySet().iterator();
++++++++while+(it.hasNext())+{
++++++++++++String+key+=+it.next();
++++++++++++String+value+=+map.get(key);
++++++++++++appendFormUrlEncoded(key,value,sb);
++++++++++++if+(it.hasNext())+{
++++++++++++++++sb.append('&');
++++++++++++}
++++++++}
++++++++return+sb.toString();
++++}

++++public+static+String+toFormUrlEncoded(String+key,+String+value)+{
++++++++StringBuilder+sb+=+new+StringBuilder();
++++++++appendFormUrlEncoded(key,+value,sb);
++++++++return+sb.toString();
++++}

++++public+static+void+appendFormUrlEncoded(String+key,+String+value,+StringBuilder+sb)+{
++++++++sb.append(key).append('=');
++++++++if+(value+!=+null)+{
++++++++++++sb.append(value);
++++++++}
++++}
}|code-block|syntax|javascript|3536912|在Wiremock测试中，您可以通过以下方式使用它：|3536913|LinkedHashMap<String,+String>+map+=+new+LinkedHashMap<>();
map.put("key1",+"value1");
map.put("key2",+"value2");

...

withRequestBody(equalTo(WireMockUtil.toFormUrlEncoded(map))).|3536914|或仅检查containing的专用部件：|offset|length|style|CODE|3536915|withRequestBody(containing(WireMockUtil.toFormUrlEncoded("key","value1"))).|3536916|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|4|A|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|D|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$E|F]]|$1|G|3|H|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|D|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$E|F]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|Y|8|@$M|Z|N|10|O|P]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|D|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$E|F]]|$1|S|3|-4|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|T|$]]

I had a similar problem - I wanted to check the exact parameters , but without patterm magic (so easier to maintain). As a workaround, I created a helper class :

<pre class="lang-java prettyprint-override"><code>import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.LinkedHashMap;

public class WireMockUtil {
 public static String toFormUrlEncoded(LinkedHashMap&lt;String, String&gt; map) {
 if (map == null) {
 return "";
 }
 StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
 Iterator&lt;String&gt; it = map.keySet().iterator();
 while (it.hasNext()) {
 String key = it.next();
 String value = map.get(key);
 appendFormUrlEncoded(key,value,sb);
 if (it.hasNext()) {
 sb.append('&amp;');
 }
 }
 return sb.toString();
 }

 public static String toFormUrlEncoded(String key, String value) {
 StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
 appendFormUrlEncoded(key, value,sb);
 return sb.toString();
 }

 public static void appendFormUrlEncoded(String key, String value, StringBuilder sb) {
 sb.append(key).append('=');
 if (value != null) {
 sb.append(value);
 }
 }
}
</code></pre>

Inside the Wiremock test you can use it via:

<pre class="lang-java prettyprint-override"><code>LinkedHashMap&lt;String, String&gt; map = new LinkedHashMap&lt;&gt;();
map.put("key1", "value1");
map.put("key2", "value2");

...

withRequestBody(equalTo(WireMockUtil.toFormUrlEncoded(map))).
</code></pre>

Or check only dedicated parts by <code>containing</code>: 

<pre class="lang-java prettyprint-override"><code>withRequestBody(containing(WireMockUtil.toFormUrlEncoded("key","value1"))).
</code></pre>

I have a simple POST request sending params using <code>application/x-www-form-urlencoded</code> encoding. 

Looking in the wiremock <a href="http://wiremock.org/docs/request-matching/" rel="noreferrer">docs</a> I can't find a way to match the request by the params values, something like the <code>querystring</code> match I mean.

Furthermore it seems also impossible to <code>contains</code> for the body, nor to match the entire body in clear (just as base64). 

Is there a way to match this kind of requests?

Wiremock match request POST by params

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我有一个简单的POST请求，使用application/x-www-form-urlencoded编码发送参数。在wiremock 中，我找不到通过参数值匹配请求的方法，类似于我所说的querystring匹配。此外，似乎也不可能为身体contains，也不可能匹配整个身体的清晰(就像base64)。有没有一种方法可以满足这种请求？

问参数发布Wiremock匹配请求
EN

回答 4

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问参数发布Wiremock匹配请求EN

回答 4

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问参数发布Wiremock匹配请求
EN