dotnet C# 在不同的机器 CPU 型号上的基准性能测试

林德熙

发布于 2024-06-16 13:13:54

1370

发布于 2024-06-16 13:13:54

文章被收录于专栏：林德熙的博客

本文将记录我在多个不同的机器上，在不同的 CPU 型号上，执行相同的我编写的 dotnet 的 Benchmark 的代码，测试不同的 CPU 型号对 C# 系的优化程度。本文非严谨测试，数值只有相对意义

以下是我的测试结果，对应的测试代码放在 github 上，可以在本文末尾找到下载代码的方法

我十分推荐你自己拉取代码，在你自己的设备上跑一下，测试其性能。且在开始之前，期望你已经掌握了基础的性能测试知识，避免出现诡异的结论

本文的测试将围绕着尽可能多的覆盖基础 CPU 指令以及基础逻辑行为。基础的 CPU 指令的性能测试已经有许多前辈测试过了，我这里重点测试的是各个 C# 系的上层业务行为下，所调用的多个 CPU 指令的最终性能影响。额外的也覆盖 CPU 缓存，逻辑分支命中，方法参数堆栈传递等的性能。本文的测试重点不在于 C# 系的相同功能的多个不同实现之间的性能对比，重点在于相同的代码在不同的 CPU 型号、内存、系统上的性能差异，正如此需求所述，本文非严谨测试，测试结果的数值只有相对意义

数组创建

英特尔 13th Gen Intel Core i7-13700K

以下是在我开发机上跑的，我开了几百个进程，有比较多干扰，但是问题不大，因为 i7-13700K 依然性能遥遥领先。等后续找个空闲的机器，再跑一次比较准确的性能测试

BenchmarkDotNet v0.13.12, Windows 11 (10.0.22631.3447/23H2/2023Update/SunValley3)
13th Gen Intel Core i7-13700K, 1 CPU, 24 logical and 16 physical cores
.NET SDK 8.0.204
  [Host]     : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), X64 RyuJIT AVX2
  Job-AXOZTJ : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), X64 RyuJIT AVX2

RunStrategy=Throughput

| Method | ArraySize | Mean | Error | StdDev | Median | Ratio | RatioSD | |————————- |———- |—————–:|—————:|—————:|—————–:|——:|——–:| | NewArray | 10 | 3.873 ns | 0.1146 ns | 0.2417 ns | 3.777 ns | 1.00 | 0.00 | | GCZeroInitialized | 10 | 12.234 ns | 0.2815 ns | 0.4382 ns | 12.168 ns | 3.15 | 0.21 | | GCZeroUninitialized | 10 | 4.470 ns | 0.1491 ns | 0.4056 ns | 4.354 ns | 1.14 | 0.13 | | NewArrayWithRandomVisit | 10 | 12.012 ns | 0.2679 ns | 0.2506 ns | 11.941 ns | 3.09 | 0.18 | | NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit | 10 | 9.839 ns | 0.3379 ns | 0.9803 ns | 9.635 ns | 2.58 | 0.26 | | | | | | | | | | | NewArray | 100 | 11.875 ns | 0.1932 ns | 0.2444 ns | 11.813 ns | 1.00 | 0.00 | | GCZeroInitialized | 100 | 21.980 ns | 0.4524 ns | 0.8931 ns | 21.820 ns | 1.88 | 0.08 | | GCZeroUninitialized | 100 | 12.126 ns | 0.2769 ns | 0.5201 ns | 11.953 ns | 1.04 | 0.05 | | NewArrayWithRandomVisit | 100 | 47.344 ns | 0.9635 ns | 2.1351 ns | 46.572 ns | 4.03 | 0.24 | | NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit | 100 | 75.207 ns | 1.4285 ns | 1.3363 ns | 75.364 ns | 6.33 | 0.15 | | | | | | | | | | | NewArray | 1000 | 110.197 ns | 2.1602 ns | 2.0206 ns | 109.619 ns | 1.00 | 0.00 | | GCZeroInitialized | 1000 | 116.560 ns | 2.0796 ns | 1.8435 ns | 116.604 ns | 1.06 | 0.03 | | GCZeroUninitialized | 1000 | 33.476 ns | 0.5921 ns | 0.5538 ns | 33.643 ns | 0.30 | 0.01 | | NewArrayWithRandomVisit | 1000 | 208.835 ns | 4.1962 ns | 8.8512 ns | 205.699 ns | 1.92 | 0.09 | | NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit | 1000 | 620.850 ns | 11.5406 ns | 10.7951 ns | 619.304 ns | 5.64 | 0.15 | | | | | | | | | | | NewArray | 10000 | 996.853 ns | 21.9389 ns | 61.8790 ns | 970.393 ns | 1.00 | 0.00 | | GCZeroInitialized | 10000 | 996.704 ns | 20.8764 ns | 58.5397 ns | 974.900 ns | 1.00 | 0.08 | | GCZeroUninitialized | 10000 | 63.200 ns | 1.0544 ns | 0.9863 ns | 63.315 ns | 0.06 | 0.00 | | NewArrayWithRandomVisit | 10000 | 1,242.151 ns | 24.2642 ns | 38.4856 ns | 1,233.944 ns | 1.21 | 0.07 | | NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit | 10000 | 6,068.245 ns | 90.8508 ns | 84.9819 ns | 6,076.727 ns | 5.79 | 0.34 | | | | | | | | | | | NewArray | 100000 | 7,381.046 ns | 137.9635 ns | 147.6194 ns | 7,372.520 ns | 1.00 | 0.00 | | GCZeroInitialized | 100000 | 7,214.089 ns | 85.2068 ns | 71.1515 ns | 7,209.220 ns | 0.97 | 0.02 | | GCZeroUninitialized | 100000 | 7,347.661 ns | 146.3643 ns | 174.2363 ns | 7,306.838 ns | 1.00 | 0.03 | | NewArrayWithRandomVisit | 100000 | 8,456.669 ns | 164.5726 ns | 219.6997 ns | 8,517.366 ns | 1.14 | 0.05 | | NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit | 100000 | 129,749.709 ns | 2,408.4302 ns | 2,773.5518 ns | 128,963.159 ns | 17.57 | 0.55 | | | | | | | | | | | NewArray | 1000000 | 59,752.036 ns | 1,194.7579 ns | 1,929.3113 ns | 59,414.325 ns | 1.00 | 0.00 | | GCZeroInitialized | 1000000 | 60,008.303 ns | 1,188.0164 ns | 1,778.1671 ns | 59,378.000 ns | 1.01 | 0.04 | | GCZeroUninitialized | 1000000 | 58,868.279 ns | 1,023.4279 ns | 957.3151 ns | 58,724.731 ns | 0.97 | 0.04 | | NewArrayWithRandomVisit | 1000000 | 56,399.609 ns | 1,068.5479 ns | 999.5204 ns | 56,296.948 ns | 0.93 | 0.03 | | NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit | 1000000 | 1,314,841.960 ns | 26,155.6618 ns | 27,986.2651 ns | 1,313,674.414 ns | 21.92 | 1.00 |

兆芯 ZHAOXIN KaiXian KX-U6780A

BenchmarkDotNet v0.13.12, UnionTech OS Desktop 20 E
ZHAOXIN KaiXian KX-U6780A2.7GHz (Max: 2.70GHz), 1 CPU, 8 logical and 8 physical cores
.NET SDK 8.0.204
  [Host]     : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), X64 RyuJIT AVX
  Job-YPUGMN : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), X64 RyuJIT AVX

RunStrategy=Throughput

Method	ArraySize	Mean	Error	StdDev	Median	Ratio	RatioSD
NewArray	10	40.20 ns	0.977 ns	1.491 ns	39.98 ns	1.00	0.00
GCZeroInitialized	10	141.12 ns	2.996 ns	6.051 ns	139.67 ns	3.54	0.18
GCZeroUninitialized	10	48.72 ns	0.849 ns	0.663 ns	48.91 ns	1.19	0.05
NewArrayWithRandomVisit	10	195.75 ns	1.082 ns	0.845 ns	195.65 ns	4.77	0.16
NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit	10	72.42 ns	1.513 ns	2.400 ns	72.45 ns	1.80	0.08

NewArray	100	135.07 ns	2.892 ns	6.100 ns	135.41 ns	1.00	0.00
GCZeroInitialized	100	228.42 ns	4.662 ns	10.135 ns	228.83 ns	1.70	0.11
GCZeroUninitialized	100	137.26 ns	2.939 ns	5.519 ns	136.70 ns	1.02	0.06
NewArrayWithRandomVisit	100	572.02 ns	11.660 ns	19.157 ns	568.34 ns	4.26	0.27
NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit	100	467.29 ns	9.357 ns	13.117 ns	464.49 ns	3.47	0.21

NewArray	1000	1,037.70 ns	20.377 ns	54.742 ns	1,031.50 ns	1.00	0.00
GCZeroInitialized	1000	1,127.93 ns	22.581 ns	59.091 ns	1,125.79 ns	1.09	0.07
GCZeroUninitialized	1000	653.93 ns	6.239 ns	4.871 ns	652.04 ns	0.60	0.02
NewArrayWithRandomVisit	1000	2,375.21 ns	47.088 ns	100.349 ns	2,352.11 ns	2.27	0.13
NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit	1000	4,474.90 ns	87.887 ns	107.933 ns	4,453.16 ns	4.19	0.28

NewArray	10000	9,586.62 ns	189.501 ns	369.608 ns	9,657.74 ns	1.00	0.00
GCZeroInitialized	10000	9,767.26 ns	194.643 ns	462.590 ns	9,811.53 ns	1.02	0.07
GCZeroUninitialized	10000	4,093.63 ns	80.993 ns	143.965 ns	4,026.86 ns	0.43	0.02
NewArrayWithRandomVisit	10000	13,908.10 ns	202.573 ns	169.158 ns	13,928.15 ns	1.47	0.06
NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit	10000	43,057.16 ns	854.132 ns	1,495.943 ns	42,914.21 ns	4.50	0.25

NewArray	100000	63,542.13 ns	576.256 ns	510.836 ns	63,519.28 ns	1.00	0.00
GCZeroInitialized	100000	66,357.64 ns	1,312.089 ns	2,118.779 ns	66,043.66 ns	1.03	0.03
GCZeroUninitialized	100000	63,638.29 ns	1,241.493 ns	1,477.909 ns	63,270.73 ns	1.01	0.03
NewArrayWithRandomVisit	100000	76,609.50 ns	1,501.442 ns	1,729.063 ns	75,958.21 ns	1.21	0.03
NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit	100000	665,286.65 ns	9,295.620 ns	7,762.264 ns	662,915.19 ns	10.47	0.16

NewArray	1000000	461,130.99 ns	9,000.698 ns	10,004.252 ns	461,306.23 ns	1.00	0.00
GCZeroInitialized	1000000	459,810.29 ns	8,893.401 ns	10,586.961 ns	455,791.25 ns	1.00	0.03
GCZeroUninitialized	1000000	456,245.03 ns	8,819.606 ns	12,363.856 ns	452,252.89 ns	0.99	0.04
NewArrayWithRandomVisit	1000000	497,132.01 ns	9,841.562 ns	12,796.810 ns	490,990.22 ns	1.08	0.03
NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit	1000000	6,742,537.03 ns	48,986.470 ns	38,245.414 ns	6,732,321.64 ns	14.51	0.31

飞腾腾锐 Phytium D2000

BenchmarkDotNet v0.13.12, Kylin V10 SP1
Phytium,D2000/8 E8C, 8 logical cores
.NET SDK 8.0.204
  [Host]     : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), Arm64 RyuJIT AdvSIMD
  Job-NHRLJG : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), Arm64 RyuJIT AdvSIMD

RunStrategy=Throughput

| Method | ArraySize | Mean | Error | StdDev | Ratio | RatioSD | |————————- |———– |——————–:|——————:|——————-:|——:|——–:| | NewArray | 10 | 22.18 ns | 0.149 ns | 0.132 ns | 1.00 | 0.00 | | GCZeroInitialized | 10 | 92.43 ns | 0.564 ns | 0.440 ns | 4.17 | 0.02 | | GCZeroUninitialized | 10 | 25.68 ns | 0.248 ns | 0.243 ns | 1.16 | 0.01 | | NewArrayWithRandomVisit | 10 | 108.25 ns | 0.299 ns | 0.250 ns | 4.88 | 0.03 | | NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit | 10 | 34.55 ns | 0.126 ns | 0.112 ns | 1.56 | 0.01 | | | | | | | | | | NewArray | 100 | 76.35 ns | 0.941 ns | 0.880 ns | 1.00 | 0.00 | | GCZeroInitialized | 100 | 163.69 ns | 0.952 ns | 0.743 ns | 2.14 | 0.03 | | GCZeroUninitialized | 100 | 80.21 ns | 0.528 ns | 0.468 ns | 1.05 | 0.02 | | NewArrayWithRandomVisit | 100 | 421.53 ns | 1.679 ns | 1.402 ns | 5.52 | 0.06 | | NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit | 100 | 300.66 ns | 1.274 ns | 1.130 ns | 3.94 | 0.05 | | | | | | | | | | NewArray | 1000 | 640.11 ns | 4.059 ns | 3.598 ns | 1.00 | 0.00 | | GCZeroInitialized | 1000 | 672.06 ns | 3.242 ns | 3.032 ns | 1.05 | 0.01 | | GCZeroUninitialized | 1000 | 483.70 ns | 2.202 ns | 1.952 ns | 0.76 | 0.01 | | NewArrayWithRandomVisit | 1000 | 1,765.24 ns | 6.469 ns | 5.402 ns | 2.76 | 0.02 | | NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit | 1000 | 2,850.39 ns | 12.971 ns | 12.133 ns | 4.45 | 0.03 | | | | | | | | | | NewArray | 10000 | 5,219.58 ns | 36.810 ns | 32.631 ns | 1.00 | 0.00 | | GCZeroInitialized | 10000 | 5,280.52 ns | 27.550 ns | 24.422 ns | 1.01 | 0.01 | | GCZeroUninitialized | 10000 | 2,640.52 ns | 44.642 ns | 34.853 ns | 0.51 | 0.01 | | NewArrayWithRandomVisit | 10000 | 8,992.89 ns | 20.367 ns | 19.052 ns | 1.72 | 0.01 | | NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit | 10000 | 26,983.43 ns | 355.773 ns | 297.086 ns | 5.17 | 0.05 | | | | | | | | | | NewArray | 100000 | 45,506.61 ns | 431.868 ns | 403.970 ns | 1.00 | 0.00 | | GCZeroInitialized | 100000 | 45,543.14 ns | 432.449 ns | 404.513 ns | 1.00 | 0.01 | | GCZeroUninitialized | 100000 | 44,461.84 ns | 331.168 ns | 309.775 ns | 0.98 | 0.01 | | NewArrayWithRandomVisit | 100000 | 57,232.01 ns | 318.770 ns | 298.178 ns | 1.26 | 0.01 | | NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit | 100000 | 445,380.51 ns | 2,904.888 ns | 2,425.713 ns | 9.78 | 0.10 | | | | | | | | | | NewArray | 1000000 | 318,862.16 ns | 1,899.267 ns | 1,683.651 ns | 1.00 | 0.00 | | GCZeroInitialized | 1000000 | 319,510.71 ns | 4,669.274 ns | 3,645.462 ns | 1.00 | 0.01 | | GCZeroUninitialized | 1000000 | 314,884.17 ns | 5,637.859 ns | 4,401.669 ns | 0.99 | 0.02 | | NewArrayWithRandomVisit | 1000000 | 357,843.40 ns | 3,063.527 ns | 2,865.625 ns | 1.12 | 0.01 | | NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit | 1000000 | 4,547,465.54 ns | 15,355.309 ns | 12,822.379 ns | 14.28 | 0.05 | | | | | | | | | | NewArray | 1000000000 | 1,541,406,672.88 ns | 35,733,853.844 ns | 102,527,125.216 ns | 1.000 | 0.00 | | GCZeroInitialized | 1000000000 | 1,548,370,215.42 ns | 38,407,327.571 ns | 110,197,822.498 ns | 1.009 | 0.10 | | GCZeroUninitialized | 1000000000 | 1,486,735.21 ns | 28,605.254 ns | 26,757.372 ns | 0.001 | 0.00 | | NewArrayWithRandomVisit | 1000000000 | 1,590,271,119.60 ns | 33,473,585.461 ns | 96,041,991.522 ns | 1.036 | 0.09 | | NewArrayWithOrdinalVisit | 1000000000 | 3,861,833,983.54 ns | 2,367,487.064 ns | 1,976,958.923 ns | 2.546 | 0.16 |

以上的飞腾腾锐 Phytium D2000 最后的测试数据预计是不正常的

数组拷贝

测试维度

参与测试的内容如下：

CopyByFor ：使用 for 循环进行拷贝数组
Memcpy ：使用标准 C 提供的 memcpy 函数进行拷贝，在 linux 下使用 libc.so.6 导出函数，在 windows 下使用 msvcrt.dll 导出函数。这处于非常裸露的方式，更具体请参阅下文的数据说明内容
CopyBlockUnaligned ：使用 dotnet 自带的 Unsafe.CopyBlockUnaligned 方法进行数组拷贝

英特尔 13th Gen Intel Core i7-13700K

数组较小

小于 1000 的数组时，存在较大 P/Invoke 干扰，于是决定最小设置为 1000 的值

BenchmarkDotNet v0.13.12, Windows 11 (10.0.22631.3447/23H2/2023Update/SunValley3)
13th Gen Intel Core i7-13700K, 1 CPU, 24 logical and 16 physical cores
.NET SDK 8.0.204
  [Host]     : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), X64 RyuJIT AVX2
  Job-GCHWHL : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), X64 RyuJIT AVX2

RunStrategy=Throughput

Method	source	dest	Mean	Error	StdDev	Ratio
CopyByFor	Int32[10000]	Int32[10000]	1,958.98 ns	8.391 ns	7.007 ns	1.000
Memcpy	Int32[10000]	Int32[10000]	609.35 ns	3.266 ns	3.055 ns	0.311
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[10000]	Int32[10000]	577.84 ns	1.391 ns	1.301 ns	0.295
CopyByFor	Int32[1000]	Int32[1000]	202.09 ns	0.376 ns	0.352 ns	0.103
Memcpy	Int32[1000]	Int32[1000]	32.21 ns	0.323 ns	0.302 ns	0.016
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[1000]	Int32[1000]	19.19 ns	0.067 ns	0.059 ns	0.010

根据上述测试数据可以看到，即使在较小数据量情况下，依然 memcpy 和 Unsafe.CopyBlockUnaligned 比 for 速度快

数组较大

BenchmarkDotNet v0.13.12, Windows 11 (10.0.22631.3447/23H2/2023Update/SunValley3)
13th Gen Intel Core i7-13700K, 1 CPU, 24 logical and 16 physical cores
.NET SDK 8.0.204
  [Host]     : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), X64 RyuJIT AVX2
  Job-DBDADP : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), X64 RyuJIT AVX2

RunStrategy=Throughput

| Method | source | dest | Mean | Error | StdDev | Median | Ratio | RatioSD | |——————- |—————– |—————– |—————–:|—————:|—————–:|—————–:|——:|——–:| | CopyByFor | Int32[100000000] | Int32[100000000] | 41,348,684.32 ns | 751,207.515 ns | 1,028,261.326 ns | 41,102,646.15 ns | 1.000 | 0.00 | | Memcpy | Int32[100000000] | Int32[100000000] | 27,086,427.67 ns | 738,121.867 ns | 2,057,588.736 ns | 26,318,143.75 ns | 0.675 | 0.05 | | CopyBlockUnaligned | Int32[100000000] | Int32[100000000] | 24,020,801.37 ns | 467,035.642 ns | 458,691.448 ns | 23,894,810.94 ns | 0.579 | 0.02 | | CopyByFor | Int32[10000000] | Int32[10000000] | 3,800,486.40 ns | 69,523.151 ns | 162,508.123 ns | 3,748,857.23 ns | 0.092 | 0.01 | | Memcpy | Int32[10000000] | Int32[10000000] | 2,313,413.90 ns | 75,362.059 ns | 208,827.911 ns | 2,248,826.17 ns | 0.058 | 0.01 | | CopyBlockUnaligned | Int32[10000000] | Int32[10000000] | 2,005,075.29 ns | 55,131.653 ns | 149,989.727 ns | 1,925,467.19 ns | 0.049 | 0.00 | | CopyByFor | Int32[1000000] | Int32[1000000] | 201,416.81 ns | 1,630.278 ns | 1,524.963 ns | 200,902.27 ns | 0.005 | 0.00 | | Memcpy | Int32[1000000] | Int32[1000000] | 104,570.31 ns | 3,304.068 ns | 9,319.184 ns | 100,412.65 ns | 0.003 | 0.00 | | CopyBlockUnaligned | Int32[1000000] | Int32[1000000] | 99,385.15 ns | 1,824.888 ns | 1,617.716 ns | 99,135.09 ns | 0.002 | 0.00 | | CopyByFor | Int32[10000] | Int32[10000] | 1,958.87 ns | 4.267 ns | 3.783 ns | 1,959.42 ns | 0.000 | 0.00 | | Memcpy | Int32[10000] | Int32[10000] | 624.06 ns | 4.451 ns | 4.164 ns | 622.60 ns | 0.000 | 0.00 | | CopyBlockUnaligned | Int32[10000] | Int32[10000] | 581.32 ns | 2.044 ns | 1.912 ns | 581.53 ns | 0.000 | 0.00 | | CopyByFor | Int32[1000] | Int32[1000] | 201.05 ns | 0.678 ns | 0.635 ns | 201.05 ns | 0.000 | 0.00 | | Memcpy | Int32[1000] | Int32[1000] | 32.12 ns | 0.638 ns | 0.683 ns | 32.10 ns | 0.000 | 0.00 | | CopyBlockUnaligned | Int32[1000] | Int32[1000] | 21.02 ns | 0.090 ns | 0.085 ns | 21.04 ns | 0.000 | 0.00 |

兆芯 ZHAOXIN KaiXian KX-U6780A

数组较小

BenchmarkDotNet v0.13.12, UnionTech OS Desktop 20 E
ZHAOXIN KaiXian KX-U6780A2.7GHz (Max: 2.70GHz), 1 CPU, 8 logical and 8 physical cores
.NET SDK 8.0.204
  [Host]     : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), X64 RyuJIT AVX
  Job-SBDPDU : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), X64 RyuJIT AVX

RunStrategy=Throughput

| Method | source | dest | Mean | Error | StdDev | Median | Ratio | RatioSD | |——————- |————- |————- |———-:|———-:|———-:|———-:|——:|——–:| | CopyByFor | Int32[10000] | Int32[10000] | 14.814 us | 0.1734 us | 0.1537 us | 14.785 us | 1.00 | 0.00 | | Memcpy | Int32[10000] | Int32[10000] | 15.329 us | 0.2950 us | 0.5167 us | 15.313 us | 1.04 | 0.04 | | CopyBlockUnaligned | Int32[10000] | Int32[10000] | 13.125 us | 0.5590 us | 1.6482 us | 13.188 us | 0.94 | 0.09 | | CopyByFor | Int32[1000] | Int32[1000] | 1.127 us | 0.0226 us | 0.0211 us | 1.127 us | 0.08 | 0.00 | | Memcpy | Int32[1000] | Int32[1000] | 2.152 us | 0.0571 us | 0.1675 us | 2.197 us | 0.13 | 0.02 | | CopyBlockUnaligned | Int32[1000] | Int32[1000] | 2.297 us | 0.0453 us | 0.0863 us | 2.279 us | 0.16 | 0.01 |

数组较大

BenchmarkDotNet v0.13.12, UnionTech OS Desktop 20 E
ZHAOXIN KaiXian KX-U6780A2.7GHz (Max: 2.70GHz), 1 CPU, 8 logical and 8 physical cores
.NET SDK 8.0.204
  [Host]     : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), X64 RyuJIT AVX
  Job-KKBWNV : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), X64 RyuJIT AVX

RunStrategy=Throughput

| Method | source | dest | Mean | Error | StdDev | Median | Ratio | RatioSD | |——————- |—————– |—————– |—————:|————–:|—————:|—————:|——:|——–:| | CopyByFor | Int32[100000000] | Int32[100000000] | 334,741.708 μs | 7,661.2780 μs | 22,469.2022 μs | 332,150.996 μs | 1.000 | 0.00 | | Memcpy | Int32[100000000] | Int32[100000000] | 164,233.004 μs | 3,256.7894 μs | 8,406.8134 μs | 161,660.880 μs | 0.493 | 0.04 | | CopyBlockUnaligned | Int32[100000000] | Int32[100000000] | 164,128.312 μs | 3,671.9104 μs | 10,826.7108 μs | 162,440.250 μs | 0.492 | 0.05 | | CopyByFor | Int32[10000000] | Int32[10000000] | 33,404.753 μs | 663.0404 μs | 1,687.6494 μs | 32,963.932 μs | 0.100 | 0.01 | | Memcpy | Int32[10000000] | Int32[10000000] | 23,405.518 μs | 1,142.2886 μs | 3,350.1346 μs | 24,879.320 μs | 0.070 | 0.01 | | CopyBlockUnaligned | Int32[10000000] | Int32[10000000] | 24,981.451 μs | 498.7301 μs | 899.3133 μs | 24,921.681 μs | 0.075 | 0.00 | | CopyByFor | Int32[1000000] | Int32[1000000] | 5,036.027 μs | 100.2153 μs | 195.4623 μs | 5,014.961 μs | 0.015 | 0.00 | | Memcpy | Int32[1000000] | Int32[1000000] | 2,585.947 μs | 51.0945 μs | 106.6533 μs | 2,601.145 μs | 0.008 | 0.00 | | CopyBlockUnaligned | Int32[1000000] | Int32[1000000] | 2,529.769 μs | 50.4126 μs | 98.3259 μs | 2,516.467 μs | 0.008 | 0.00 | | CopyByFor | Int32[10000] | Int32[10000] | 13.663 μs | 0.2509 μs | 0.2224 μs | 13.680 μs | 0.000 | 0.00 | | Memcpy | Int32[10000] | Int32[10000] | 10.112 μs | 0.1976 μs | 0.2957 μs | 10.131 μs | 0.000 | 0.00 | | CopyBlockUnaligned | Int32[10000] | Int32[10000] | 10.010 μs | 0.1742 μs | 0.1630 μs | 9.964 μs | 0.000 | 0.00 | | CopyByFor | Int32[1000] | Int32[1000] | 1.088 μs | 0.0058 μs | 0.0045 μs | 1.089 μs | 0.000 | 0.00 | | Memcpy | Int32[1000] | Int32[1000] | 1.358 μs | 0.0266 μs | 0.0364 μs | 1.355 μs | 0.000 | 0.00 | | CopyBlockUnaligned | Int32[1000] | Int32[1000] | 1.349 μs | 0.0267 μs | 0.0461 μs | 1.334 μs | 0.000 | 0.00 |

数据说明

通过数据对比 Intel 和兆芯以上测试数据，可以看到在 Int32[10000] 的测试数据集里面，轻松就可以看到 Intel 比兆芯快了 10 倍，如下图所示

在如下图的对比 Intel 和兆芯的对较大的数组进行拷贝的性能，可以看到 Intel 平台也的确能够比兆芯快出 10 倍的性能

具体的性能比较如下

方法	数组长度	Intel	兆芯	Intel比兆芯	兆芯比Intel
CopyByFor	Int32[100000000]	41,348,684.32	334,741,708.00	0.1235241481	8.095583052
Memcpy	Int32[100000000]	27,086,427.67	164,233,004.00	0.1649268235	6.063295094
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[100000000]	24,020,801.37	164,128,312.00	0.1463537953	6.832757553
CopyByFor	Int32[10000000]	3,800,486.40	33,404,753.00	0.1137708278	8.789599405
Memcpy	Int32[10000000]	2,313,413.90	23,405,518.00	0.0988405341	10.11730672
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[10000000]	2,005,075.29	24,981,451.00	0.0802625632	12.45910871
CopyByFor	Int32[1000000]	201,416.81	5,036,027.00	0.0399951807	25.00301241
Memcpy	Int32[1000000]	104,570.31	2,585,947.00	0.0404379169	24.72926589
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[1000000]	99,385.15	2,529,769.00	0.0392862550	25.45419512
CopyByFor	Int32[10000]	1,958.87	13,663.00	0.1433704165	6.974939634
Memcpy	Int32[10000]	624.06	10,112.00	0.0617147943	16.20357017
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[10000]	581.32	10,010.00	0.0580739261	17.21943164
CopyByFor	Int32[1000]	201.05	1,088.00	0.1847886029	5.411589157
Memcpy	Int32[1000]	32.12	1,358.00	0.0236524300	42.27895392
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[1000]	21.02	1,349.00	0.0155819125	64.17697431

更具体的对兆芯的分析：在对较小的数组进行拷贝，使用 for 进行拷贝的速度比标准 C 的 memcpy 函数快，使用 for 循环进行拷贝与 dotnet 的 Unsafe.CopyBlockUnaligned 差不多。而在 Intel 平台下，无论是标准 C 的 memcpy 还是 dotnet 的 Unsafe.CopyBlockUnaligned 都比 for 快几倍。这就意味着无论是 memcpy 还是 CopyBlockUnaligned 里面的指令优化，在兆芯下都是负优化

在更大的数据两情况下，可以看到 Intel 平台的 memcpy 和 CopyBlockUnaligned 对 for 循环的优化比率不断下跌，其数据情况如下

数组长度	CopyByFor	Memcpy	CopyBlockUnaligned	CopyByFor与Memcpy比率	CopyByFor与CopyBlockUnaligned比率
1000	201.05	32.12	21.02	6.259339975	9.564700285
10000	1,958.87	624.06	581.32	3.138912925	3.369693112
1000000	201,416.81	104,570.31	99,385.15	1.926137639	2.026628827
10000000	3,800,486.40	2,313,413.90	2,005,075.29	1.642804342	1.895433263
100000000	41,348,684.32	27,086,427.67	24,020,801.37	1.52654624	1.721369894

我的猜测是随着数组长度增加，将逐渐超过了 Intel 的 CPU 的缓存，导致了比率的下降。但无论如何，使用 memcpy 和 CopyBlockUnaligned 在 Intel 下都有优化

这就是为什么在数组较大时，如在 100000000 长度时，相同的 Memcpy 方法下兆芯比Intel的耗时比例为 6.06 倍。相较于在 1000 长度时，兆芯比Intel的耗时比例为 42.27 倍小了非常多。如此可以看到其实也不能全怪兆芯，只是因为 Intel 的优化比较强，导致看起来差异比较大

在数组长度比较大的时候，在兆芯上也是 memcpy 会比 for 循环拷贝更快。且 memcpy 和 CopyBlockUnaligned 的性能也是基本持平的。也就是说在数据量比较大的时候，使用 dotnet 自带的 Unsafe.CopyBlockUnaligned 方法还是很有意义的，既速度快又相对安全。在数据量比较小的时候，使用 CopyBlockUnaligned 依然不会有较大的性能损失

飞腾腾锐 Phytium D2000

数组较大

BenchmarkDotNet v0.13.12, Kylin V10 SP1 Phytium,D2000/8 E8C, 8 logical cores .NET SDK 8.0.204 [Host] : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), Arm64 RyuJIT AdvSIMD Job-QEJWOH : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), Arm64 RyuJIT AdvSIMD

RunStrategy=Throughput

Method	source	dest	Mean	Error	StdDev	Ratio
CopyByFor	Int32[100000000]	Int32[100000000]	161,848,301.3 ns	275,376.77 ns	229,952.07 ns	1.000
Memcpy	Int32[100000000]	Int32[100000000]	139,057,784.0 ns	493,850.72 ns	437,785.80 ns	0.859
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[100000000]	Int32[100000000]	137,746,376.7 ns	740,242.45 ns	618,135.97 ns	0.851
CopyByFor	Int32[10000000]	Int32[10000000]	15,514,977.7 ns	33,694.59 ns	29,869.38 ns	0.096
Memcpy	Int32[10000000]	Int32[10000000]	14,492,865.7 ns	40,272.32 ns	35,700.37 ns	0.090
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[10000000]	Int32[10000000]	14,497,063.8 ns	38,595.84 ns	30,133.09 ns	0.090
CopyByFor	Int32[1000000]	Int32[1000000]	1,240,798.0 ns	15,140.32 ns	14,162.26 ns	0.008
Memcpy	Int32[1000000]	Int32[1000000]	1,046,522.7 ns	20,519.03 ns	19,193.52 ns	0.006
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[1000000]	Int32[1000000]	1,032,201.1 ns	19,159.44 ns	17,921.75 ns	0.006
CopyByFor	Int32[10000]	Int32[10000]	8,930.6 ns	9.04 ns	8.02 ns	0.000
Memcpy	Int32[10000]	Int32[10000]	3,058.1 ns	12.31 ns	11.51 ns	0.000
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[10000]	Int32[10000]	3,199.1 ns	16.51 ns	12.89 ns	0.000
CopyByFor	Int32[1000]	Int32[1000]	886.8 ns	0.66 ns	0.59 ns	0.000
Memcpy	Int32[1000]	Int32[1000]	250.3 ns	0.36 ns	0.30 ns	0.000
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[1000]	Int32[1000]	235.8 ns	0.29 ns	0.25 ns	0.000

数据说明和对比

飞腾腾锐 Phytium,D2000/8 E8C, 8 logical cores 的跑分不高，与 Intel 最大差距在数组拷贝上能拉到 10 倍，均值性能差距是 4 倍左右。但在我的测试里面飞腾腾锐的性能比兆芯快，大概均值性能差距是 2 倍左右，如以下对比

方法	数组长度	Intel	兆芯	飞腾腾锐	Intel比兆芯	兆芯比Intel	飞腾比Intel	兆芯比飞腾
CopyByFor	Int32[100000000]	41,348,684.32	334,741,708.00	161,848,301.30	0.1235241481	8.0955830519	3.9142309837	2.0682435670
Memcpy	Int32[100000000]	27,086,427.67	164,233,004.00	139,057,784.00	0.1649268235	6.0632950938	5.1338547000	1.1810414295
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[100000000]	24,020,801.37	164,128,312.00	137,746,376.70	0.1463537953	6.8327575534	5.7344621679	1.1915254392
CopyByFor	Int32[10000000]	3,800,486.40	33,404,753.00	15,514,977.70	0.1137708278	8.7895994050	4.0823663255	2.1530648413
Memcpy	Int32[10000000]	2,313,413.90	23,405,518.00	14,492,865.70	0.0988405341	10.1173067215	6.2647093544	1.6149682530
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[10000000]	2,005,075.29	24,981,451.00	14,497,063.80	0.0802625632	12.4591087051	7.2301842591	1.7232076333
CopyByFor	Int32[1000000]	201,416.81	5,036,027.00	1,240,798.00	0.0399951807	25.0030124099	6.1603497742	4.0587001269
Memcpy	Int32[1000000]	104,570.31	2,585,947.00	1,046,522.70	0.0404379169	24.7292658882	10.0078377888	2.4709898791
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[1000000]	99,385.15	2,529,769.00	1,032,201.10	0.0392862550	25.4541951187	10.3858685125	2.4508489673
CopyByFor	Int32[10000]	1,958.87	13,663.00	8,930.60	0.1433704165	6.9749396336	4.5590570074	1.5299084048
Memcpy	Int32[10000]	624.06	10,112.00	3,058.10	0.0617147943	16.2035701695	4.9003300965	3.3066282986
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[10000]	581.32	10,010.00	3,199.10	0.0580739261	17.2194316383	5.5031652102	3.1290050327
CopyByFor	Int32[1000]	201.05	1,088.00	886.80	0.1847886029	5.4115891569	4.4108430739	1.2268831755
Memcpy	Int32[1000]	32.12	1,358.00	250.30	0.0236524300	42.2789539228	7.7926525529	5.4254894127
CopyBlockUnaligned	Int32[1000]	21.02	1,349.00	235.80	0.0155819125	64.1769743102	11.2178877260	5.7209499576

代码

本文代码放在 github 和 gitee 上，可以使用如下命令行拉取代码

先创建一个空文件夹，接着使用命令行 cd 命令进入此空文件夹，在命令行里面输入以下代码，即可获取到本文的代码

git init
git remote add origin https://gitee.com/lindexi/lindexi_gd.git
git pull origin 7a4584ca15a250812de76fc5b35adcaaca2e531d

以上使用的是 gitee 的源，如果 gitee 不能访问，请替换为 github 的源。请在命令行继续输入以下代码，将 gitee 源换成 github 源进行拉取代码

git remote remove origin
git remote add origin https://github.com/lindexi/lindexi_gd.git
git pull origin 7a4584ca15a250812de76fc5b35adcaaca2e531d

获取代码之后，进入 BulowukaileFeanayjairwo 文件夹，即可获取到源代码

特别感谢

特别感谢 https://github.com/mjebrahimi/Performance-Wars-Benchmarking-CSharp 提供的代码

参考文档

C# 标准性能测试

C# 标准性能测试高级用法

dotnet 6 数组拷贝性能对比

本文参与腾讯云自媒体同步曝光计划，分享自作者个人站点/博客。

如有侵权请联系 cloudcommunity@tencent.com 删除

本文分享自作者个人站点/博客前往查看

如有侵权，请联系 cloudcommunity@tencent.com 删除。

本文参与腾讯云自媒体同步曝光计划，欢迎热爱写作的你一起参与！