volatile引发的一个有趣的测试

103style

发布于 2022-12-19 13:51:57

2050

发布于 2022-12-19 13:51:57

文章被收录于专栏：Android开发经验分享

转载请以链接形式标明出处：本文出自:103style的博客

本文是看到这篇文章中 “volatile 的意义？” 那一小节提供的一个例子引发的测试。

volatile 的意义？

防止CPU指令重排序

volatile有两条关键的语义：

保证被volatile修饰的变量对所有线程都是可见的
禁止进行指令重排序

下面的例子是用来证明下面这个观点的后半句是错误的。

由于volatile修饰的变量在各个线程里都是一致的，所以基于volatile变量的运算在多线程并发的情况下是安全的。

原测试示例

例子是这样的：

public class Test {
    private volatile int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        new Test().test();
    }
    private void test() {
        Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
                add();
            }
        };
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            Thread thread = new Thread(runnable);
            thread.start();
        }
        System.out.println("start = " + start);
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}

大家可以看看最后运行的结果输出的 start 值是多少 ?

给 add 方法加上 synchronized 之后

给 add() 方法加上 synchronized 之后输出的 start 值又是多少呢？

public class Test {
    private volatile int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        new Test().test();
    }
    private void test() {
        Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
                add();
            }
        };
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            Thread thread = new Thread(runnable);
            thread.start();
        }
        System.out.println("start = " + start);
    }
    synchronized void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}

两个测试的结果

两个结果都是 100？还是只有第二个是100 ?

其实两个结果都不是100，这是因为 main方法对应的线程不会等待新创建的线程执行完。

我们可以加上时间输出看看试试：

public class Test {
    private volatile int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        new Test().test();
    }
    private void test() {
        Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
                add();
                System.out.println("new thread: " + System.currentTimeMillis());
            }
        };
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            Thread thread = new Thread(runnable);
            thread.start();
        }
        System.out.println("start = " + start);
        System.out.println("main: " + System.currentTimeMillis());
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}

控制台打印的结果：

new thread: 1583915204005
new thread: 1583915204005
new thread: 1583915204007
new thread: 1583915204007
new thread: 1583915204007
new thread: 1583915204007
start = 60
main: 1583915204007
new thread: 1583915204008
new thread: 1583915204008
new thread: 1583915204008
new thread: 1583915204008

可以看到 main方法对应的线程先执行完了。

然后为了解决 main方法对应的线程先执行完，我们加上 Thread.sleep(1000); 看看：

public class Test {
    private volatile int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        new Test().test();
    }
    private void test() {
        Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
                add();
                System.out.println("new thread: " + System.currentTimeMillis());
            }
        };
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            Thread thread = new Thread(runnable);
            thread.start();
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(1000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        System.out.println("start = " + start);
        System.out.println("main: " + System.currentTimeMillis());
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}

查看控制台输出：

new thread: 1583915390819
new thread: 1583915390821
new thread: 1583915390822
new thread: 1583915390823
new thread: 1583915390823
new thread: 1583915390823
new thread: 1583915390823
new thread: 1583915390823
new thread: 1583915390823
new thread: 1583915390823
start = 100
main: 1583915391822

去掉修饰 start 的 volatile 修饰符

然后我们试试把 volatile 修饰符去掉试试，运行的结果输出的 start 值是多少 ?

我们修改代码如下：

public class Test {
    private int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
            res.add(new Test().test());
        }
        System.out.println(res);
    }
    private int test() {
        Runnable runnable = () -> add();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            Thread thread = new Thread(runnable);
            thread.start();
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(100);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        return start;
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}

查看控制台输出：

[100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100]

就不卖关子了，这里结果没问题的原因主要是因为创建线程的耗时比 add 方法执行的耗时还长，所以就相当与单线程执行了，我们可以来验证下。

public class Test {
    private int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        new Test().test();
    }
    private int test() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            long t = System.nanoTime();
            Thread thread = new Thread(new TestRunnable(i));
            System.out.println(i + "_new_thred: " + (System.nanoTime() - t));
            thread.start();
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(100);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        return start;
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
    private class TestRunnable implements Runnable {
        int id;
        public TestRunnable(int i) {
            id = i;
        }
        @Override
        public void run() {
            long t = System.nanoTime();
            add();
            System.out.println(id + "_add: " + (System.nanoTime() - t));
        }
    }
}

查看控制台输出：

0_new_thred: 1232700
1_new_thred: 31800
2_new_thred: 18000
3_new_thred: 24500
0_add: 62100
4_new_thred: 19700
5_new_thred: 76800
3_add: 19200
6_new_thred: 22300
7_new_thred: 24500
8_new_thred: 32000
9_new_thred: 26100
4_add: 23100
8_add: 20000
7_add: 18400
1_add: 20900
2_add: 19600
5_add: 40300
9_add: 22100
6_add: 23600

当我们修改 add 方法的次数为 10W 次之后：

public class Test {
    private int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            res.add(new Test().test());
        }
        System.out.println(res);
    }
    private int test() {
        Runnable runnable = () -> add();
        ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(100);
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            executorService.execute(runnable);
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(1000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        executorService.shutdown();
        return start;
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}

查看控制台输出：

[9337838, 9957329, 10000000, 10000000, 10000000, 9925170, 10000000, 9922369, 10000000, 10000000]

修改上面的测试代码，给 start 添加 volatile 修饰符：

public class Test {
    private volatile int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            res.add(new Test().test());
        }
        System.out.println(res);
    }
    private int test() {
        Runnable runnable = () -> add();
        ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(100);
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            executorService.execute(runnable);
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(1000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        executorService.shutdown();
        return start;
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}

查看控制台输出：

[2292403, 2449807, 2146843, 1899033, 2120498, 4689152, 2264998, 2181451, 2266435, 2443323]

可以发现结果也是不对的。

执行结果正确的代码

要正确输出结果我们可以修改代码如下：

public class Test {
    private int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            res.add(new Test().test());
        }
        System.out.println(res);
    }

    private int test() {
        Runnable runnable = () -> add();
        ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            executorService.execute(runnable);
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(1000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        executorService.shutdown();
        return start;
    }
    synchronized void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}

或者

public class Test {
    private AtomicInteger start = new AtomicInteger(0);
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            res.add(new Test().test());
        }
        System.out.println(res);
    }
    private int test() {
        Runnable runnable = () -> add();
        ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            executorService.execute(runnable);
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(1000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        executorService.shutdown();
        return start.get();
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
            start.addAndGet(1);
        }
    }
}

或者

public class Test {
    private static ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();
    private int start = 0;

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            res.add(new Test().test());
        }
        System.out.println(res);
    }

    private int test() {
        Runnable runnable = () -> add();
        ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            executorService.execute(runnable);
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(1000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        executorService.shutdown();
        return start;
    }

    void add() {
        lock.lock();
        try {
            for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
                start++;
            }
        } finally {
            lock.unlock();
        }
    }
}

以上

本文参与腾讯云自媒体同步曝光计划，分享自作者个人站点/博客。

原始发表：2020-03-11，如有侵权请联系 cloudcommunity@tencent.com 删除

编程算法

腾讯云测试服务

本文分享自作者个人站点/博客前往查看

如有侵权，请联系 cloudcommunity@tencent.com 删除。

本文参与腾讯云自媒体同步曝光计划，欢迎热爱写作的你一起参与！

编程算法

腾讯云测试服务

登录后参与评论

0 条评论

热度